Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

At around 02:10 on April 7, 2015, the Defendant: (a) expressed an identification card to the Defendant that the victim F (the age of 49) and the police officer (the age of 25) were working in the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju District E District Police Station E District of Gwangju, who was reported on 112, demanded the Defendant to present an identification card on the drinking price; (b) the Defendant expressed that “this cppppp, rings, nis, police nis, nis, and mothers are fat; and (c) fats the chest part of the above G, 4 times in fats, and fats the chest part, which continued to restrain the Defendant from doing harm to the right side of the victim F, thereby hindering the Defendant’s legitimate treatment of the victim police officer’s report on treatment, etc., as well as hindering the Defendant’s performance of his duties, as well as hindering the victim’s treatment and treatment of the remaining part, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning G and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Optional fine;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act is that the Defendant, while reflecting the instant crime in depth, would not again lead to recommitting the instant crime; the Defendant has no record of punishment since 2000, there was no record of punishment exceeding the fine, and there was no record of criminal punishment for obstruction of performance of official duties; the victim F’s injury requires two-time medical treatment; the degree of injury is not much weighted; the Defendant committed the instant crime under the influence of alcohol, resulting in contingent injury to the Defendant, and the Defendant appears to have supported the Defendant’s disabled person of Grade ゲ with visual disability with a mental disability.