1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. In the first instance trial, the Plaintiff sought payment of KRW 41,109430 in total, including the sum of KRW 3,963,210 in total and KRW 37,146,220 in the amount of loans and loans paid by the Defendant (=basic salary of KRW 34,146,220 in the amount of KRW 2,00 in the vehicle maintenance cost of KRW 1,00,000 in the amount of KRW 1,100 in the amount of KRW 34,146,220 in the amount of loans and loans paid by the Defendant. The first instance court rendered a judgment that dismissed all the Plaintiff’s claims.

For this reason, only the Plaintiff appealed and, except for the portion demanding the payment of KRW 3,963,210 out of the loan and the amount paid in substitution, the Plaintiff also sought payment of KRW 36,786,220 out of KRW 37,146,220. Thus, the scope of the court’s trial is limited to the portion demanding the reduced remuneration.

2. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or each entry in Gap evidence No. 3-1, Gap evidence No. 10, and No. 25 may be admitted by integrating the whole purport of the pleadings. A.

On February 10, 2010, the defendant is a stock company incorporated with capital of 300,000,000, 30,0000, and the par value per share of 10,000 won, and the plaintiff is registered as each shareholder on the register of shareholders with 10,000 shares (3.33%) and H 20,00 shares (67%) on the register of shareholders.

B. From May 24, 2010 to the day of the closing of argument in the trial, the Plaintiff was in office as a director of the Defendant, and H was in office as the Defendant’s representative director and in-house director from May 24, 2010 to May 24, 2010. On July 19, 2012, I was in office as the representative director, and I was in office as the Defendant’s representative director and in-house director, respectively, and was appointed as the auditor.

C. Around 2010, the Plaintiff performed various duties related to the “D Corporation,” “E Corporation,” “F Corporation,” “G Corporation,” etc. performed by the Defendant.

3. Summary of the parties' arguments;

A. The Plaintiff’s basic monthly salary of KRW 3,200,000, vehicle maintenance expenses of KRW 200,000, and food expenses of KRW 200,000, as the Plaintiff’s former representative director, from the Defendant.