logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2013.12.06 2012고합383
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(13세미만미성년자강제추행)
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person who operates a “E” childcare center located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun.

On October 201, 201, the Defendant: (a) on the early October 201, at the head of the above E-Child-Care Center, the Defendant: (b) was deemed to be bad to the victim F (the age of four) who was born at the victim’s room; (c) was off the victim’s panty, and committed an indecent act by force

B. The Defendant, on October 201, was at the front guard of the E-Childcare Center.

In the same way as the paragraph, the victim committed an indecent act by force on the part of the victim.

C. On October 13, 201, the Defendant is a child care center in the above E-child care center.

In the same way as the paragraph, the victim committed an indecent act by force on the part of the victim.

The defendant is a police officer in the above E-care center in October 201.

In the same way as the paragraph, the victim committed an indecent act by force on the part of the victim.

2. The defendant and his defense counsel did not commit an indecent act against the victim as stated in each of the facts charged in the instant case.

3. Determination

A. Evidence 1) As evidence consistent with or consistent with each of the facts charged in the instant case, each of the statements made by the injured party and the injured party G and the victim's arguments recorded in the statements recorded in the statement recording CD, each of the statements made by G investigation agencies and this court, G's own statements made in G, H, I, and J's investigation agencies and in this court, G's own statements made in this court, the assistant nurse K's statements made in this court, the preparation of the original sawtotop support center's individual counseling records prepared in this court, the preparation of the M's opinion made in the statement recording CD, the comprehensive statement of the N's opinion made in the statement statement and psychological evaluation report made in the N's written statement prepared by the Child Care Center belonging to the Chungcheong Sea Center, the preparatory evaluation report made by P, the director of the Child Family Counseling Center, the preparation of Q Q, and the child care center in this case (hereinafter referred to as the "instant case").

There are photographs of the victim, medical certificates and written confirmations, and answers. 2) However, each of the above.

arrow