1. The Defendant’s KRW 5,00,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual interest from September 4, 2018 to April 25, 2019, and the following.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Defendant is a company running a trade business related to recyclables, etc., and is subscribed to industrial accident compensation insurance (hereinafter “industrial accident compensation insurance”), and the Plaintiff is a Mongolian country employee who entered the Republic of Korea as the status of stay in the Republic of Korea on August 5, 2014, and has worked for the Defendant company from July 27, 2015 to October 13, 2016.

B. The employees of Defendant Company, including the Plaintiff, put the used clothes that are moved through the consortium level (the rubber materials are, and both are installed.) into both sides, into the collection and classification of them. The Plaintiff was not classified by additionally classifying them in the last part of the consortium level, and the remaining stacks were not stored in the classification by additionally classifying them.

C. On August 27, 2015, while carrying out the aforementioned work, the Plaintiff was subject to an accident that is used by the front part of the arm’s length on the wind that was worn at the time by inserting fin under the control of the consortium (hereinafter “instant accident”) by cutting fin under the control of the consortium and cutting fin under the control of the consortium.

Upon the occurrence of the instant accident, the head of the Defendant Company’s factory C had the Plaintiff go to the D Hospital and received medical treatment, and the doctor of D Hospital diagnosed the Plaintiff with “the Plaintiff’s 2-Do image”, and the Defendant was able to receive industrial accident insurance benefits against the Plaintiff.

E. Upon obtaining approval for medical care from the Korea Workers’ Compensation and Welfare Service, the Plaintiff received medical care from August 27, 2015 to August 18, 2016. On January 12, 2017, the Plaintiff approved additional medical care and received medical care on the ground that an additional surgery is necessary.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 6, Eul evidence 1 and 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The defendant company asserted that the plaintiff's defendant company works for the classification of clothes above Belgium.