beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
(b) for any reason, the sale will not assert the right of ownership, etc. and, in the event of a violation of each of the above Articles, the sale price, taxes and public charges, and all the costs related to the apartment of this case (if any, the value at that time) will be paid to the person entered in blank.
The notarial deed of promissory notes prepared separately from the above subparagraphs of Article 10 shall be returned or nullified where the defendant delivers documents necessary for the transfer registration of ownership to the person entered in blank.
(See 14 to 15 pages - 2 of the Agreement - The defendant does not raise an objection to the apartment of this case even if the purchaser has, due to unavoidable reasons or to a person designated by the purchaser (the name of a third party), and does not require any additional money, and does not transfer ownership to the last purchaser (see e.g., see 16 pages). - The power of attorney of a promissory note - The power of attorney of a promissory note - The power of attorney of a promissory note 200,000 won per face value.
C. On April 21, 2014, the Plaintiff acquired the right to lease of the instant apartment from D to KRW 186,00,000 (i.e., KRW 106,000,000 + KRW 80,0000 on deposit for lease) and occupied the instant apartment on May 3, 2014.
On January 12, 2016, the Korea Land and Housing Corporation and the Defendant increased the lease deposit of the instant apartment to KRW 111,194,00,00, and concluded a lease contract with the term of lease from February 1, 2016 to January 31, 2018. The increased lease deposit amount of KRW 5,194,00 was actually borne by the Plaintiff.
However, while there was no change in the name of the tenant in the name of the plaintiff with respect to the apartment of this case, the Korea Land and Housing Corporation, which became aware that the actual resident of the apartment of this case was the plaintiff, terminates the lease contract with the defendant on the ground of illegal sub-lease, and demands the plaintiff to deliver the apartment of this case, the plaintiff on July 31, 2017.