beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's primary and conjunctive claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The legal nature of the apartment of this case is 1) The Yansan-gu E apartment of 105 Dong-dong 502 (hereinafter “the apartment of this case”).
A) Around October 1985, Defendant C is a publicly constructed rental house of 20 years, constructed with the approval of a project plan pursuant to Article 33 of the former Housing Construction Promotion Act. (2) After the expiration of the mandatory rental period of the instant apartment, Defendant C obtained approval from the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City on May 14, 2010 for the instant apartment after the expiration of the mandatory rental period.
B. Defendant D’s lease contract and sub-lease contract 1) around May 2002, Defendant D leased the instant apartment from Defendant C to KRW 5,556,300, monthly rent of KRW 54,100. (2) On October 8, 2005, Defendant D concluded a sub-lease contract between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff for the rent of KRW 10,000, monthly rent of KRW 140,000, monthly rent of KRW 140,00, and from November 25, 2005 to November 25, 2007, the Plaintiff paid the said sub-lease deposit to Defendant D.
3) On November 13, 2006, Defendant D transferred to the Plaintiff the status of the lessee and the status of the buyer having the right to sell the instant apartment at KRW 20,00,000 regarding the instant apartment. (c) Defendant C’s conversion for sale in lots and the sales of the instant apartment. Defendant D did not conclude a sales contract by November 14, 201, which is the expiration date of the period for the sale in lots of the instant apartment, and Defendant C notified Defendant D of the fact that the said lease was terminated on September 19, 201 as the waiver of the sale in lots of the instant apartment.
2) On June 14, 2012, Defendant C sold 18 households, including the instant apartment, to Defendant B for purchase price of KRW 990,00,00,00. On July 23, 2012, Defendant C notified Defendant D of the change of rental business operator (including succession to the status of rental business operator) and that the lease contract is succeeded to Defendant B, a rental business operator. D. Defendant B’s claim for ownership of the instant apartment of this case against Defendant B on October 17, 2012.