Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, at around 23:30 on May 26, 2016, is under the influence of alcohol and penalty against D and Si expenses, other than the prosecution, in front of the “Cjuk” located in Namwon-si B.

Although police officers were dispatched to the above site after receiving a report 112, they assaulted the face face of the above D one time in his/her hand, and against this, D was taken at one time in his/her face due to drinking.

The Defendant continued to separate the Defendant from the Defendant and D, and the Defendant, according to D’s intent that “a request to punish the police officer as a assault case,” prevented the Defendant from blocking the back of the patrol vehicle and preventing the Defendant from working voluntarily to the police station to conduct the investigation.”

As above, the Defendant: (a) she saw the victim as a slope F and franc with the E District line belonging to the Jeonnam Police Station, the victim; (b) she saw the victim as “the victim ought to do so, she shall do so, and she shall do so once”; (c) francing the victim’s labels; and (d) francing the victim’s franc with her hand.

After all, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the prevention and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Investigation reports (victim's telephone conversations cases) and investigation reports (verification of the status, etc. at the same time as the victim police officers are relative);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the crime of obstruction of the performance of official duties is a crime detrimental to the foundation of the rule of law by nullifying the legitimate exercise of public authority, and thus requires strict punishment. The crime of obstruction of the performance of official duties is considerably heavy criminal records due to violent crimes, the crime of this case is committed during the period of suspension of execution, and the degree and circumstances of obstruction of the performance of official duties of this case shall be