logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.09.28 2018고정1838
사문서위조등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the vice president of B, and C is the representative director under the name of B, and the person who intends to obtain permission for the business of trading cultural properties shall handle cultural properties in a museum, etc. for at least two years, but C did not have worked in the museum.

A. The defendant supported when recruiting members of the above company

D For the purpose of inserting and exercising a career certificate in the name of the Korean Self-denunciation Museum of Korea, the career certificate in the name of D in the name of the above company located in the second floor of Seoul EM building around January 18, 2018, which was entered in the computer network column, etc. in the column of the applicant on the certificate, etc.

D Only the name and date of birth of a group shall be deleted, and the name and date of birth of the group shall be

May 16, 2008 - January 2, 2016, and at the bottom thereof.

With no deletion on January 2, 2018, the record certificate in the name of the Korean Self-denunciation Museum, which is a private document on the proof of fact, was forged by stating false facts in the applicant column, “C” and “F self-denunciation” in the applicant column.

B. On January 18, 2018, the Defendant exercised the above investigation document by submitting an application for permission for the trade of cultural heritage to H, a person in charge of cultural sports of the Gu Office, who is aware of such fact, as if the forged career certificate was duly established at the Gu Office.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written accusation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes reporting investigation results;

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime (the point of Article 231 of the Private Document), Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act (the point of uttering of the above investigation document), and the selection of fines, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow