Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On February 12, 2017, the Defendant: (a) violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) and the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) on the road in front of the Seoul Southern-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul; (b) around KRW 1km from the road in front of the Seoul Southern-gu, Seoul Northern-ro, Hancheon-ro, Seoul, to the 980 neighboring road; and (c) under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.098% while under the influence of alcohol while under the influence of alcohol.
2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (hereinafter referred to as "Aggravated Punishment, etc.") and the violation of the Road Traffic Act (after the accident) are those who are engaged in driving of the last car.
On February 12, 2017, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, as described in paragraph 1 of around 22:00, driven the front car in the above body, and driven the side road that is not divided into D in front of the Seoul Southern-gu Seoul Metropolitan Area, driving from the right edge to the elementary school for transportation.
In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle shall accurately operate the steering system, brakes, etc. of the motor vehicle, and has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely driving the motor vehicle, such as well-beinging the surrounding traffic situation.
Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and proceeded as it was while driving the victim E (25) driving, FCA100 Oba, which was proceeding in the opposite part of the defendant, received the middle part of the left-hand side of the driver's vehicle as part of the first left-hand side of the driver's vehicle.
Ultimately, the Defendant, due to the above occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim, such as cerebrovasin in need of medical treatment for about three weeks, and, at the same time, escaped without taking measures such as aiding and abetting the victim, even though the Defendant destroyed the above Baba to cover KRW 1,346,100 for repairing expenses.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement made by the police for E;
1. A written statement of the occurrence of E traffic accidents;
1. A survey report on actual conditions;
1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;
1. The driver's license ledger;
1. A medical certificate;
1. Written estimate;