The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The judgment of the court below that found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case, although the Defendant did not inflict an injury on the victim with the exception of the flabbbbage of the victim.

B. In light of the various sentencing conditions in the instant case of unfair sentencing, the lower court’s punishment (one million won of fine) against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

2. Judgment on the assertion of mistake of facts

A. On May 13, 2012, the summary of the facts charged in the instant case appears to be “five times” in the judgment of the court below, although the Defendant stated “five times” as “five times” in the text of the judgment of the court below as follows: (a) on May 13, 2012, the Defendant had a dispute over noise issues between the floor and the floor noise issues in the Nowon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seocheon-gu C apartment complex; and (b) on drinking, the Defendant appears

Since then, the breath of the victim's bomb, and the police officers arrested together with the victim and moved the police vehicle into the earth after receiving 112 report, the victim's head was boomed for about 14 days, and the victim was in need of treatment for about 14 days.

B. The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged by comprehensively taking account of the macroficial evidence.

다. 당심의 판단 살피건대, 원심이 적법하게 채택조사한 증거들에 의하여 인정할 수 있는 다음과 같은 사정, 즉 ① 피해자는 수사기관에서부터 원심 법정에 이르기까지 피고인이 주먹으로 자신의 머리를 때리고 멱살을 잡아 흔들었으며, 순찰차 안에서 풀어진 허리띠를 손으로 감아서 허리띠의 쇠뭉치 부분으로 자신의 머리를 1회 때렸다고 비교적 일관되고 구체적으로 진술한 점, ② 이 사건 범행 직후 촬영된 피해자에 대한 상해부위사진의 영상에 의하면 피해자의 목부위가 빨갛게 상기되어 있고, 머리부위에 상처가 있는 점, ③ 이 사건 범행이...