The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant alleged a misunderstanding of facts and legal principles did not have any misunderstandings and misunderstandings of the victim’s lux, and the Defendant’s luxing of the victim’s luxing was fluxed to the victim, and thus, the Defendant’s luxing of the victim’s luxing of the victim’s luxing in order to prevent the Defendant from getting off the victim’s luxing, and thus, the Defendant was found guilty of an emergency escape or a justifiable act.

B. The lower court’s punishment (an amount of KRW 500,000) that was unreasonably alleged in sentencing is too unreasonable.

2. Determination on the misapprehension of facts and misapprehension of legal principles

A. On August 31, 2016, the Defendant: (a) committed assault against the victim on the ground that the victim expressed his desire to “satise fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe f.

B. We examine whether the Defendant assaulted the victim, i.e., the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, i.e., the Defendant continues to deny the instant crime from the investigative agency to the court of the trial at the court at the same time. However, upon examining the statements in detail, the Defendant made a statement at the investigative agency to the effect that “the Defendant: (a) was able to have the victim s/he was s/shed with his/her her s/ her s/ her s/ her s/ her s/ her s/ her her s/ her her s/ her hers/ her her her/ her her her/ her her her/ her her/ her her/ her her/ her her/ her her/ her her/ her her/ her her/ her her/ her/ her her/ her/ her/ her.