A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On August 5, 2015, at around 23:00, the Defendant committed an indecent act by force against the victim E (V, 37 years of age) who took place on a bus following the Defendant at the bus stops located in 309, Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul, for a private apartment street bus stops.

After resisting the resistance, one's cell phone was broken and the one's cell phone was found to be reported to the police, and the one who assaults the victim's face.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of witness E;

1. A letter of arrest of a flagrant offender;

1. Application of the laws and subordinate statutes emitting Defendant 1

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime. Article 260 (Selection of Penalty)

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order / [The defendant was broken with Handphones in response to the defendant's abscopon from the damaged person's family.]

Even though he was aware of the fact that he was in a situation cited by him due to the fact that he had been being asked, he continuously assaulted the victim's behavior, resulting in an aggressive intention, and assaulted the victim's coin part.

It is reasonable to see that the victim saw her pain on her part, and there are objective circumstances in which she received medical treatment from a hospital her part of the crime

1. On August 5, 2015, around 23:00 on August 5, 2015, the Defendant: (a) committed an indecent act by force against the victim E (V, 37 years of age) who followed the Defendant at the bus bus stops located in 309, Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul.

As a result, the cellular phone was damaged by the cell phone, which was cited in the hand, and caused the cell phone to be broken away from the floor and the cell phone was damaged by the cell phone.

2. As evidence consistent with this part of the facts charged, there are witness E’s legal statement and photographs of damage to property.

However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, i.e., the victim.