1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is the same as the part of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the following reasons. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(No different findings of fact and judgments of the first instance court shall be made, considering the allegations and evidence added in the trial. In the second instance judgment, the case “10” in Part 20 shall be considered as “9”.

Serial No. 32,700 L. 14, 201 insurance policy (name of the product) on June 30, 2008, the monthly insurance premium of 1 M. 1 M. Mez (F. 12,000 insurance policy on June 12, 2008, 200 N. 12,00 N. 20 L. 20,000 insurance policy on December 9, 2003 AI P. 32,700 L. 40, 2010 insurance policy on November 30, 209; 30,50,000 insurance premium of Samsung 20,50,000 insurance premium of 20,014,50,000 insurance premium of Samsung 20,50,014,000 insurance premium of 20,710,01,67,014,07,01,04,04,07,04,00.

Part 6 of the judgment of the court of first instance states "342,525 won" as "38,825 won (56,300 won in total of insurance premiums of the instant insurance contract of this case)".

Part 6 of the judgment of the first instance court, "10 cases" in Part 14 shall be "9 cases".

Article 15-16 of the judgment of the court of first instance provides that "If there are two insurance contracts which are terminated, and the driver's insurance is two cases, it shall be deemed that there are three insurance contracts which are terminated and driver's insurance, it shall be deemed that there are 1,8,9 of the separate insurance contracts of this case."

[326,125 won (= KRW 32,700, KRW 55,000, KRW 40,000, KRW 44,425) of the first instance judgment No. 60-21 of the second instance judgment “326,125 won (= KRW 94,000, KRW 40,000)”