[Defendant A] Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On September 24, 2015, Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years in one year and six months, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on October 2, 2015, due to a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective deadly weapon, etc.) at the Busan District Court.

[2] Defendant A is an insurance solicitor of the above branch, who is a building of Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H, a victim I on the 14th floor to whom the mission has changed from K K Co., Ltd. to I Co., Ltd. on May 17, 2016, Defendant B is the head of the Center of the above branch, and Defendant C is an insurance solicitor of the above branch.

When maintaining a life insurance contract for one year, the Defendants: (a) have an insurance solicitor receive fees from the insurance company according to the performance of the insurance solicitation; and (b) have an insurance solicitor obtain profits from the insurance company on condition that the insurance solicitor pay the relevant insurance premium, even if they are engaged in the insurance solicitation on condition that the insurance solicitor pay the insurance premium, the Defendants may obtain profits equivalent to the difference between the commission and the amount of the premium paid in lieu of the insurance premium, and (c) have the insurance purchaser enter into or maintain the insurance on condition that the insurance premium be paid in lieu of the amount of the insurance premium until the payment of the insurance premium is made after receiving the fee; (d) have the said insurance contractor enter into the insurance company through the insurance company with the payment of the insurance premium in lieu of the insurance premium and submitted it to the insurance company through the victim company; and (e) have the said insurance contractor enter into the insurance company through the insurance company with the insurance premium paid in lieu of

On November 25, 2014, the Defendants conspired to enter into an insurance contract with L in collusion, stating that “The name of the contractor to pay insurance premiums is changed” and that “the name of the contractor to pay insurance premiums is changed.” The Defendants drafted an insurance contract with L-based UL type insurance (type 2, additional type 2).