A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person engaging in driving a C-A-car.

At around 08:20 on November 11, 2014, the Defendant driven the said car with a blood alcohol content of 0.168%, without obtaining a driver’s license, and driven the front road of the “E” located in D at the Gangwon-si of the Gangwon-si at a speed that cannot be seen as a high-quality outflow on the brea-dong bank.

Since the location is an intersection where signal lights are installed, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to observe the signal and to safely drive the front side and the right and the right of the motor vehicle in such a case.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to drinking while driving a motor vehicle in a situation where normal driving is difficult due to the negligence of driving the motor vehicle in violation of the signal while normal driving is difficult, followed by G G G G G 5F125 Oba driven by the victim F (year 71) and caused the victim to be shocked with the part of the front part of the said motor vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as cutting the body body frame, which requires approximately 12 weeks of treatment due to the above occupational negligence.

2. On November 11, 2014, at around 08:15, the Defendant, without obtaining a driver’s license, driven a C Eccoo vehicle with approximately 300 meters alcohol concentration of 0.168% on the front day of the “E” road located within the Gangwon-si D drinkinglley at the Gangwon-si, Gangwon-si, and around 08:20 on the same day at around 08:20 on the same day.

3. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act is a holder of a vehicle in C Eubs.

No automobile which is not covered by mandatory insurance shall be operated on a road.

Nevertheless, the defendant operated the above automobile which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the same time and place as Paragraph 2.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement; 1.1.