1. Each of 1, 25, 29, 22, 12, and 1, indicated in the attached Form No. 1, 25, 29, 22, 12, and 1, respectively, to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

1. In full view of the overall purport of the pleadings as a result of the commission of the survey and appraisal on the Korea Land Information Corporation, the basic facts were as follows: (a) Nos. 1 to 4 (including a provisional number); and (b) Nos. 1 to 4; and (c) the entire purport of the argument as to the Korea Land Information Corporation, the ownership transfer registration was completed on the ground of the termination of title trust on February 20, 2002, for the following reasons: (a) the 12m2 was divided into G forest and 378m2; and (b) the ownership transfer registration was completed on August 28, 2006.

(hereinafter “instant land” under the registry refers to the ownership transfer registration for the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant; hereinafter the Plaintiff) to share 49/378 shares on the registry, the Defendant (except for the case of distinguishing the Plaintiff from Defendant E, Counterclaim Plaintiff; hereinafter the same shall apply) B, C, and D shares 132/378 shares, 38 shares, 148/378 shares, 148/378 shares, and Defendant E shares 11/378 shares. However, in fact, it can be acknowledged that the Plaintiff and the Defendants own a separate ownership by specifying the location and size as indicated in the separate sheet.

2. The instant land is in mutual title trust relationship between the Plaintiff and the Defendants with respect to the determination of the principal claim and the counterclaim claim. The Plaintiff served a duplicate of the application for correction of the purport of the claim as of August 10, 2018, and the Defendants, and the Defendant Lessee, upon the delivery of a duplicate of the counterclaim, expressed their intent to terminate each mutual title trust to the Plaintiff. As such, the Defendants and the Plaintiff are liable to implement the registration procedure for transfer of ownership based on the termination of the title trust, respectively, as indicated

3. Conclusion: (a) the Plaintiff’s principal claim and the Defendant’s counterclaim by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Plaintiff) accept all of the claims on grounds of merit.