logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2018.07.06 2018고정395
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 2017, the Defendant: (a) from D operating a commercial sex trafficking business establishment, “C” in Bupyeong-si B around 2017; (b) would receive 1-30,000 won for customers with sexual traffic; and (c) from the front of the said business establishment, the Defendant may have sexual intercourse between 10-120,000 won and 1-30,000 won for many unspecified men.

“At the same place of business,” after advertising and accompanying the said place, the said place to engage in commercial sex acts with female employees, and received 1-30,000 won per person under the pretext of introduction, as well as the receipt of 1-30,000 won per person from July 1, 2017 to July 23:00, 2017, and arranged commercial sex acts by receiving introduction expenses for bringing customers to an unspecified number of unspecified number of commercial sex acts establishments in the same way.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police officer against the accused, D, E, or F;

1. The written statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (in response to results of digital evidence analysis), results of digital evidence analysis;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including the relevant Article of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including the preparation of a punishment, and the preparation of a fine for acts of arranging sexual traffic;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 7 million for committing an offense, such as supplying sexual traffic women to a sexual traffic business establishment by using vehicles in around 2011. On May 27, 2015, even if he had been sentenced to a fine of KRW 500,000,00 for committing an offense committed around May 27, 2015, the Defendant again committed the instant offense. The Defendant introduced the place where the instant marina business establishment was operated to D, allowing D to operate the instant business establishment by providing them with the location where the instant marina business establishment was operated, and taking into account the fact that, in the course of arranging sexual traffic, the Defendant appears to have been engaged in considerable role and involvement in the instant business in arranging sexual traffic.

Provided, That if the defendant recognizes a mistake, he shall do so.

arrow