logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.05.07 2015고정344
축산물위생관리법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

Defendant

B If the above fine is not paid, 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B From September 23, 2013, a person who works as a general director of Defendant A, a corporation that engages in meat packaging business on the first floor of Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seoul Metropolitan Government, as a general director.

1. Defendant B

(a) Any meat packaging business operator and his/her employees, when conducting business, shall indicate the sanitary processing, packaging, keeping, transport, display, and sale of livestock products as “dispacting” the livestock products whose expiration date has passed and store them by dividing them into a certain area within a refrigerating, freezing, freezing or facility.

Nevertheless, around May 27, 2014, the Defendant kept 61.8km (Distribution Deadline March 25, 2014), 38km (Distribution Deadline June 6, 2013), 8.4km (Distribution Deadline March 28, 2014), and 5.5km (Distribution Deadline April 12, 2014) in the Republic of Korea, without being indicated as “defishing”, without distinguishing a certain area into the warehouse.

(b) No person shall sell livestock products whose standards for labeling are determined, or process, pack, store, or transport them for sale;

Nevertheless, around May 27, 2014, the Defendant kept 33.6 km in a freezing warehouse with no indication as set forth above at the workplace A, the Defendant kept 33.6 km.

2. Defendant A, a Defendant’s employee, violated matters to be observed by business operators, etc. regarding the Defendant’s business as stated in paragraph (1), and stored livestock products with no indication specified in the standard for sale.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the Defendants (as of the second trial date)

1. Investigation report (Violation of the Livestock Products Sanitary Control Act) and investigation report (Hearing statements from A E director of a stock company);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to documentary evidence of violating establishments;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

A. Defendant A: August 6, 2013 of the former Livestock Products Sanitary Control Act.

arrow