A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. 공무집행 방해 피고인은 2015. 10. 3. 01:30 경 서울 용산구 B 앞 노상에서, 술에 취하여 잠에 들어 있다가, 위와 같이 ‘ 길에서 자는 사람이 있다’ 는 취지의 112 신고를 받고 현장에 출동한 피해자 서울 용산 경찰서 C 파출소 소속 D(35 세) 과 E(28 세 )로부터 “ 찻길은 위험하니 도로 위로 올라가 달라” 는 취지의 말을 듣자 위 경찰관들에게 “ 내가 뭘 잘못했느냐

Whether he/she commits a crime;

The face of each person shall be taken off and the face shall be wrong.

씨 발 놈 닥쳐 라 ”라고 말하고, 주먹으로 위 경찰관 D의 가슴을 수 회 밀치고, 주먹을 위 경찰관 E에게 휘두르고, 발로 위 경찰관들의 다리를 수 회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted police officers, thereby obstructing police officers' legitimate performance of official duties on handling 112 reports.

2. In around 01:55 on October 3, 2015, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender for interference with the performance of official duties under the above paragraph (1) and was transferred to Cmpout in Yongsan-gu Seoul, Yongsan-gu, Seoul. As a result, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender, and was transferred to Cmpout in the Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Yongsan-gu, Seoul. In the presence of the civil petitioners, he would have the victim of Yongsan-gu Police Station C (35 years old) and E (28 years old) cut off and cut off the spout to the spouter.

“Publicly insulting victims by speaking as a large sound.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D and E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense (a point of obstructing the performance of official duties) of the same Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the conditions favorable to the reasons for sentencing as set forth below) is that the sentencing criteria are not applied without presenting a separate handling method for the ordinary concurrent crimes.

The defendant's mistake is recognized and divided.