A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 9, 2020, at around 06:53, the Defendant:121, around the taxi platform of Kimhae-si, and reported on 112, “A passenger fright to drink and fright to drink.” On several occasions, the Defendant recommended C to go home to the Defendant; the police officer, including the patrolman C, was fright to go home on the floor on the ground that he was fright to the end of the taxi article and was not fright to the Defendant’s horse, and was fright to go on the floor, and fright to the above patrolman, who was frighted to go on the floor of plastic chairs, and fright to stop this, “A fright to fright to arrest and fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright and fright to fright to fright to fright to fright.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C, D, E’s written statement, police and prosecutor’s protocol of statement, respectively, and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the 112 Incident Report and Handling Table;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (only the case of a fine and its radius);

1. To render a judgment as ordered on the grounds of probation and community service order for not less than the grounds of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act (including an order of consultation on alcohol issues and medical treatment);