logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.02.04 2015고단7112
관세법위반
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 30,000,000 won.

except that this shall not apply.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a representative director of Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, who has overall control over contracts, customs clearance, etc. in relation to the importation of clothing, and Defendant B is a corporation established for the purpose of export, entry, distribution, etc. of clothing.

1. Defendant A

A. On February 11, 2011, the Defendant evaded customs duties (entrusted trade) filed an import declaration with Pyeongtaek customs office 78 Chapter 78 of the clothing manufactured by the consignment processing trade method at the above company office, and filed an import declaration with Pyeongtaek customs office. However, as if the actual consignment processing cost of the above goods was USD 1,092, but was 585.936, the Defendant filed a declaration to reduce the discretionary processing cost and evaded customs duties equivalent to USD 506.064, the difference in customs duties equivalent to USD 506.064, and then filed a declaration to reduce the customs duties amounting to USD 74,417, as shown in the attached list of crimes (1) from around that time to February 5, 2015, the Defendant filed an import declaration of the above processed clothing 442,970 via the same method, and reduced the customs duties amount to USD 2,89,1471 US$ 1,3181,18381,297.7

B. On December 23, 2010, the Defendant evaded customs duties (import of finished products) at the office of the foregoing company on December 23, 2010, when filing an import declaration with the Incheon Customs Office on the 78 Chapter 78 of the clothing manufactured in China as G, the Defendant filed a reduced declaration of the price as if the actual price of the above goods was USD 3,045, but was USD 1,365, and subsequently evaded customs duties equivalent to USD 1,680, 252,948, which is equivalent to USD 1,680, as shown in the attached list of crimes (2) and then filed in the attached list of crimes (2). The Defendant evaded customs duties (import of finished products) on the same method as 90 times from around that time to November 10, 2014, and filed a reduced declaration of the actual price as if the actual price was USD 7,304,640.78, but was equivalent to USD 4,83,171.625.

2. The defendant B, a representative director of the defendant, is the defendant's business at the time and place mentioned in each of the above paragraph (1).

arrow