(영문) 대구지방법원포항지원 2015.01.13 2014가단2370

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원포항지원 2015.01.13 2014가단2370

손해배상(자)

Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 447,244,352 to Plaintiff A; (b) KRW 6,00,000 to Plaintiff B; and (c) each of them, from January 26, 2012 to January 25, 2015.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The facts of recognition 1) C, at around 13:20 on January 26, 2012, operated D 14 tons of cargo and proceeded along D 14 tons of cargo, and proceeded to the intersection of the ethal distance distance from the ethal of the ethal in the north-gu, Seoul at the port of port to the port of port via the port of port at the port of ethal, in violation of the signal, and went to the port of the port, and the part of the ethal in front of the Ethal in front of the above cargo vehicle, driven by the Plaintiff A who turn to the left from the ethal surface of the ethal in the ethals of the ethalle in the ethals of the city, with the front wheels of the above cargo vehicle (hereinafter “the first accident”); F, while driving the dump truck at the same time and at the same place, conflicts with the front side of the above ethal truck (hereinafter “the second accident” and “the first accident”).

2) The Plaintiff A suffered injury, such as the structural frame of the right pellley, due to the instant accident. (2) The Plaintiff B is the father of the Plaintiff, and the Defendant is the insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with the said cargo vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant”).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, each entry of Gap evidence 1 to 4 (including provisional number), and the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable for damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the accident of this case as the insurer of the defendant vehicle.

C. The defendant's claim on the limitation of liability against the defendant is alleged to the effect that the plaintiff A was negligent in sending the defendant's vehicle that violated the signal at the time of the accident. However, the submitted evidence alone is insufficient to acknowledge it, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Thus, the defendant's claim is not accepted.

2. The attached amount of damages, except as otherwise stated below within the scope of liability for damages.

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2014.12.10 2013가단146792

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.11.09 2016나48517

-전주지방법원 2016.05.20 2014나6285

-서울동부지방법원 2014.09.17 2013나4960

-서울중앙지방법원 2015.11.26 2013가단116173