logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2019.10.17 2019고단767 (1)
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 9, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. at the Incheon District Court, and on October 10, 2017, the Defendant completed the enforcement of the sentence in the first prison of the North Korean defectors.

The defendant of "2019 Highest 767" solicited Co-defendant B and the Internet fraud to prepare living expenses.

Accordingly, around November 8, 2018, the Defendants posted a notice to the effect that “gallon S9 shall be sold at the Internet C site” on the website of Incheon, and made a false statement to the effect that “430,000 won shall be remitted to the victim D who contacted the notice.”

However, the defendants did not have the above mobile phone, and even if they received the above money, they thought that they will use it in living expenses, but did not have the intention or ability to send the mobile phone.

The Defendants, as seen above, by deceiving the victim and receiving 430,000 won from the victim’s E account in the name of Defendant B on the same day from around that day to December 9 of the same year, received a total of 1,60,000 won from the victims through a total of six times, as shown in the attached list of crimes.

The Defendant recruited Co-Defendant B and the Internet fraud to prepare living expenses.

On February 6, 2019, the Defendants posted a letter to the Internet F and sell Aphone X mobile phone with access to the Internet F, and then send a cell phone to the victim G who reported and contacted the above letter to the victim G who sent KRW 450,000 to the victim G.

The purpose was to make a false statement to the effect that "...."

However, as the Defendants did not have the above mobile phone, the Defendants thought that they will use the money for living expenses even if they received the money, and did not have the intention or ability to send the mobile phone.

As above, the Defendants deceiving the victim and deceiving him is the same as the victim.

arrow