1. The Defendant’s KRW 103,761,373 and KRW 103,761,00 among them shall be 10% per annum from June 8, 2017 to June 19, 2017.

In full view of the purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3 (including a branch number), the plaintiff, on February 26, 2015, set the term of guarantee to be KRW 104,00,000, and the term of guarantee to be extended on February 25, 2016. According to the above credit guarantee agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant, the plaintiff, when the plaintiff performs the guaranteed obligation, agreed to pay the plaintiff the amount of subrogated payment, delay damages, penalty, substitute payments, guarantee fees, and fees set forth in the Credit Guarantee Fund Act. However, the credit guarantee accident of the defendant's late payment of the above loan occurred, and the plaintiff collected part of the amount of subrogated payment of KRW 105,094,478 to the national bank on June 5, 2017, and then appropriated it for the repayment of principal, the amount of damages payable by the plaintiff to be reduced to KRW 103,71,008, and the amount of damages payable to the defendant 216,2516.

According to the facts found above, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 103,761,373 won (103,761,08 won in fixed amount of 103,761,008 won in subrogation) and 103,761,008 won in fixed amount of subrogated payment (365 won in fixed amount of 103,761,008 won in subrogation) with 103,761,008 won in fixed amount from June 8, 2017 to June 19, 2017, which is obvious in the record that the original copy of the payment order was served on the defendant.

If so, the plaintiff's claim shall be accepted for the reasons and it is so decided as per Disposition.