logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2016.12.15 2016고단2356
사기등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, for eight months, and for six months, for each of the defendants C.

except that this shall not apply.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the owner of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H 2-story Housing (hereinafter referred to as the “instant building”) located in Seongdong-gu G Housing Redevelopment Improvement Zone, and Defendant B and C are the lessees of the said housing.

According to the provisions of the Seoul Metropolitan Government Ordinance on the Improvement of Urban and Residential Environments, a tenant who resides in a housing redevelopment improvement zone and has continuously resided in his/her house from three months before the date of public inspection and announcement for the designation of an improvement zone until the date of relocation due to the authorization for project implementation, may be supplied with rental housing, but the tenant who resides in

Defendant

B Since July 2006, since it leased and resided in the rooftop of the instant building, it resided in the said housing redevelopment improvement zone from August 23, 2007, which was the date of public inspection and announcement for the designation of the G housing redevelopment improvement zone, but the said building was not eligible to be supplied with rental housing as it constitutes an unauthorized building.

Defendant

Cdo from May 196, 1996, the rooftop of the instant building was leased and resided. However, since the rooftop of the said building constituted an unauthorized building, the said building was not entitled to be supplied with rental housing.

Nevertheless, the Defendants conspired and conspired, around January 8, 2007, and around January 15, 1997, when Defendant C moved into the building of this case, they abuse that only the lot number (Seoul Seongdongdong H) of the building of this case was recorded in the resident registration card of this case since March 2010. Defendant B leased and resided in the 1st floor of the building of this case from Defendant A around January 2010, and Defendant C leased and resided in the 2nd floor of the building of this case from Defendant A from January 2010, and when the fact-finding survey was conducted, rental housing is established by pretending that Defendant B and C reside in the 1st floor and the 2nd floor of the building of this case from the time of the move-in report.

arrow