logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2019.05.22 2019고단1186
모욕
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

The defendant is the plaintiff who lost his son, the victim B is the plaintiff who was a taxi driver.

On January 13, 2018, at around 01:46, the Defendant laid the taxi of the victim who was stopped to wait for a taxi reservation in Mapo-gu, and publicly insultingd the Defendant, such as “Ig, fry, fry, fry, fry, fry, fry, fry, fry, and fry,” at the place in which the subscription was made.

However, the facts charged in the instant case are those falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and can be prosecuted only when the victim files a complaint under Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act.

According to the records, it can be recognized that the victim D has cancelled the complaint against the defendant around January 18, 2019.

Pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act, the prosecution of this case is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow