Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
The defendant is the plaintiff who lost his son, the victim B is the plaintiff who was a taxi driver.
On January 13, 2018, at around 01:46, the Defendant laid the taxi of the victim who was stopped to wait for a taxi reservation in Mapo-gu, and publicly insultingd the Defendant, such as “Ig, fry, fry, fry, fry, fry, fry, fry, fry, and fry,” at the place in which the subscription was made.
However, the facts charged in the instant case are those falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and can be prosecuted only when the victim files a complaint under Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act.
According to the records, it can be recognized that the victim D has cancelled the complaint against the defendant around January 18, 2019.
Pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act, the prosecution of this case is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.