Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On January 27, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspension of the execution of six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Cheongju District Court on February 4, 2015, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 4, 2015.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On October 15, 2009, the Defendant made a false statement to the husband E of the victim D, stating, “I wish to pay money by May 15, 201 when borrowing money. I borrowed money. I wish to pay money by May 15, 201.”

However, in fact, the defendant was in the state of the restaurant operated by the defendant, and the owned building has no value as security because the market price was set up, and there was no intention or ability to repay the borrowed money as the excessive obligation was promised.

Nevertheless, the Defendant deceivings the victim through the above E and received 10,000,000 won in cash from the victim.

2. On October 16, 2009, the Defendant made a false statement at F stores, “I would pay from F stores to F stores up to August 15, 2010 if it is urgently required to borrow money.” However, the Defendant was a restaurant operated by the Defendant, and the building owned was also at the market price, and there was little security value, and there was no intention to repay the borrowed money as the Defendant promised to pay excessive debt. Nevertheless, the Defendant was urged the victim through the above E, and the Defendant was issued a cash amount of KRW 5,50,000,000 from the victim. On November 29, 201, 201, the Defendant purchased and sold KRW 20,000,000 from the trade name “Gs” at the address of the Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter referred to as Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter referred to as “IB”) to E from its domicile.

However, in fact, the defendant was in the state of the restaurant operated by the defendant, and the owned building was also at the market price, and there was almost no collateral value, and the borrowed money is repaid as the excessive debt is promised.