1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part concerning Plaintiff B stock company is modified as follows:

Plaintiff B.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows: ① the part of the first instance court's 5, 18, 6, 16 of the 5, 5, 18, 6, and 16 of the 5, 6, 17, and 21 of the 6, 6, 17, and 21 of the 1st instance court's judgment. The 6, 6, 17, and 21 of the 1st instance court's judgment's reasoning is the same, except for the following cases

2. The part to be dried (the part to be dried);

C. The following circumstances, which were acknowledged as the result of the fact-finding conducted by the court of the competent trial on the grounds of limitation on liability of the plaintiffs 1, including the following facts: (a) the fire of this case caused by the defect of the cooling house, namely, the fire of this case, which was installed adjacent to the cooling house of this case, was released early due to the invalidity of spraying; and (b) the fire of this case was not caused by the fire of this case; (c) the fire of this case, which had been installed adjacent to the cooling house of this case; (d) the fire of this case, for which 5 years have not passed after the release of this case, cannot be deemed to have been used for a long period in consideration of the general cooling period; (e) E appears to have been used in the air condition with the air condition, and (e) the fire fighter belonging to the Seo-gu District Fire Station, who conducted a field investigation after the fire of this case, had already been relocated to the location at the time of fire, and thus, at least the distance between the air conditionr and the air condition of this case.