1. The plaintiff (appointed)'s claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the plaintiff (appointed party).

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Project approval and public announcement - Project name: Construction works, Hanam-si 2nd: Defendant - Public announcement of project approval: C on December 9, 2016;

B. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling of expropriation on April 12, 2018 (hereinafter “instant ruling of expropriation”) - Articles subject to expropriation: D forest land 112 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”): The date of the ruling of expropriation: June 7, 2018 - Compensation for losses: as indicated below.

Serial Selection: 177,500 317,500 386,580 2 G 1697/7/1697 73,500 85,570 317,570 3177,500 380 317,580 386,580 4 I 97,500 177,500 150 1,159,760 5 J 1697/31697 317,50386,580 380,580 6 K 232327,507,7027,717,8307/1697 L/ 1697, 1657, 307, 167, 167, 307, 167, 167, 1697

C. The Central Land Tribunal rendered an objection on October 25, 2018 (hereinafter “instant objection”) - Compensation for losses: The same (Dismissal of the instant objection) as the compensation for losses for the expropriation of the instant case - An appraisal corporation: N & P & P Co., Ltd.

D. As a result of the commission of appraisal to appraiser P - Compensation for losses: 【No dispute exists which falls short of compensation for losses (175,00 won per square meter per 1 square meter) for the instant adjudication on expropriation, the fact that there is no ground for recognition, Gap Nos. 1, 2, and Eul No. 1 (including additional numbers), the inquiry results on the Korea Highway Corporation by this court, the result of inquiry about the fact that the appraiser P was commissioned by this court, the purport of the entire pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff (Appointed Party)’s motion to expropriate the instant land and the instant objection ruling did not properly consider the individual factors and other factors of the instant land, and did not properly reflect the adequate value of the instant land.

Therefore, the compensation for the plaintiff (appointed party) and the designated parties should be increased by KRW 20 million, respectively, rather than the compensation for the decision of acceptance of this case.

(b).