1. The defendant,

A. As to Plaintiff C’s KRW 630,50, Plaintiff D’s KRW 864,000, and each of the said money, it was from July 9, 2014.

1. Basic facts

A. Approval and Public Notice of Projects - F Urban Development Project (hereinafter “instant Project”) - G Public Notice at Jeonju on December 12, 2008, H Public Notice at Jeonju on December 10, 2009, H Public Notice at Jeonju on December 29, 201, I Public Notice at Jeonju on December 29, 201, and J Public Notice at Jeonju on June 4, 2013 - Defendant and Jeonbuk Development Corporation:

B. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling of expropriation on December 19, 2013 - Compensation subject to compensation: The land owned by the Plaintiffs as indicated below (hereinafter “each of the instant lands”). K died on February 20, 1995 and jointly inherited the assets of the Plaintiff A and B by 1/2 shares): Compensation for losses: The same shall be as indicated in the column for “adjudication of expropriation” in the attached Table.

- An appraisal corporation: - An appraisal corporation on February 11, 2014 - An appraisal corporation, a light appraisal corporation, a national appraisal corporation, or a uniform appraisal corporation;

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on May 22, 2014 - Compensation subject to compensation: Each of the land in the instant case - Compensation for losses: The term “the amount of objection” in the attached Table is indicated.

- An appraisal corporation: a national appraisal corporation, a corporation with the same appraisal capacity, a corporation with the same appraisal capacity, a corporation with same appraisal capacity and Korea Appraisal Board

D. The result of the commission of appraisal to the appraiser L of this Court (hereinafter “court appraisal”): The amount of compensation for loss to the land of this case - Contents of appraisal: The statement in the column of “court appraisal amount” in the annexed sheet is the same.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1-2, Eul evidence 1-1-4, Eul evidence 3-1-10, each entry in 1-2 of Eul evidence 3-10, the result of appraisal commission to the appraiser L of this court, and the purport of whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. Since both the plaintiffs' assertion acceptance ruling and objection ruling are illegal and unfair by setting the amount of compensation too low, the amount of compensation for the plaintiffs should be increased to the amount stated in the purport of the claim.

B. Each form the basis for adjudication of expropriation in a lawsuit concerning an increase or decrease in land expropriation compensation 1.