The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (three years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The following facts are: (a) the Defendant led to the confession of a crime; (b) the Defendant was receiving treatment of alcohol dependence; (c) the victim F, who did not agree with the victims; and (d) committed a crime against the victim F, which is not good; (c) the Defendant committed a total of seven times repeatedly, i.e., intimidation against the female at approximately four months after having been discharged from prison for four years; and (d) the Defendant committed a crime of injury, which has been committed 27 times before and after having been discharged from prison; and (d) the fact that there was a history of punishment for the crime of injury.

In full view of the above sentencing factors, considering the Defendant’s age, family relation, economic situation, background and motive leading to the crime, and all other matters regarding the sentencing specified in the records and arguments in this case, the judgment below’s punishment is deemed appropriate, and the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.