The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal is unfair because the punishment (one year and six months of imprisonment, and one hundred thousand won of collection) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment is based on the following facts: (a) the confession of the crime was made; (b) the Defendant’s wife suffers liver cancer; (c) the Defendant’s wife suffers from liver cancer; (d) the cooperation in the investigation of the narcotics offender is a favorable reason for sentencing; and (e) the amount of philopon in possession is not smaller than 1.07g; (c) the same criminal record is seven times; and (d) the offender again commits the crime following the day when he was released from prison for one year due to the same kind of crime; and (e) the crime related to narcotics is a disadvantageous reason for sentencing that the

In full view of the above sentencing factors, considering the Defendant’s age, family relation, economic situation, background and motive leading to the crime, and all other matters regarding the sentencing specified in the records and arguments in this case, the judgment below’s punishment is deemed appropriate, and the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.