logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.05.31 2018고단130
특수공무집행방해
Text

The defendant is not guilty, and the summary of the judgment of innocence is publicly notified.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is as follows: (a) around 00:5 on August 20, 2017, the Defendant 106-dong 1501, Gwangju Northern-gu, Gwangju Northern-dong 106-dong 1501; and (b) on his hand the knife (the knife 20cm knife knife knife, 12cm knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife

Anywhere fababa

”라고 묻자 “ 나가. 안 나가면 죽여 버린다” 고 3 차례에 걸쳐 위협하고, 식칼을 오른손에 쥔 채로 일어나 E을 향해 한 발자국 다가서면서 오른손에 들고 있던 식칼을 뒤로 빼 E을 찌르려는 듯 위협하여 경찰공무원의 정당한 직무집행을 방해하였다.

2. Determination

A. The rejection of evidence as evidence consistent with the facts charged in the instant case includes the witness E and F’s respective legal statements, E’s statements in the police interrogation protocol against the Defendant, and the police statements in E and F’s respective police statements, such as investigation reports (as to the situation after entry into residence) submitted by the prosecutor, etc., and E and F’s statements in investigation agencies, but it is difficult to easily believe for the following reasons.

1) The Defendant consistently stated to the effect that “Bara” was seated in a sofa, fa, and the instant knife knife knife, and the instant knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife E, or knife knife knife knife knife.

B) On the other hand, while undergoing the initial investigation, E made a statement to the effect that “the Defendant, knife, knife, knife, knife, and knife, knife and knife,” and did not submit as evidence the protocol prepared at the time of the initial investigation for E, and includes the statement at the time of the initial investigation on the last 70th page of the statement as of August 24, 2017;

In August 24, 2017, the defendant was investigated.

arrow