1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

The reasoning for the court's explanation on this case is that the witness D's testimony is fit for the defendant's argument that the secured debt of the right to collateral security, which was completed on February 25, 2009 by the receipt No. 2113 as of February 25, 2009, as evidence additionally submitted at the trial, for the first instance court's additional statement, is not sufficient to give specific answers to the contents and scope of the above secured debt, and the grounds for setting the maximum debt amount at KRW 80 million, etc., and the contents of the statement are ambiguous and not trust, but the statement of this case is insufficient to recognize the defendant's argument is rejected as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for the rejection of the written evidence No. 9 or 19, which is stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance.

Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.