1. The defendant's appeal and the plaintiff's incidental appeal are all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal and the incidental costs thereof shall be individually considered.

1. The reasons for the court's explanation of this case are as follows: "All 6 pages 4 of the judgment of the court of first instance" are added to "(the plaintiff excluded the part of KRW 50 million invested by the plaintiff from the claim amount of this case out of the lease deposit of the restaurant of this case, which is the business property of this case)", and this court additionally submitted evidence which is insufficient to recognize each argument of the plaintiff and the defendant, and rejected Gap evidence Nos. 17 and Eul Nos. 4 to 19 of the evidence (including the number of pages) which are the same as the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, so they are cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and all of the defendant's appeal and the plaintiff's incidental appeal are dismissed as it is without merit.