Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Defendant

Of the facts charged against A, three separate checks are listed in the table of crimes in attached Form A.

Punishment of the crime

1. “2016 Highest 2371” - Defendant A received a lot of orders from convenience stores and China, etc. on June 2014, at the office of Defendant management in Bupyeong-si, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si, Busan, and from the employees F of the victim E company “three-minute instant cups, a new product he prepares in three-minutes, a new product he prepares in three-minutes, and receives more orders from convenience stores and China.

If materials are supplied as Gyeonggi-do chemical factories have been prepared, the price will be paid.

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have any property or income, and since the material supplied by the injured party plans to lend cash to others, there was no intention or ability to pay the material price to the injured party.

On July 4, 2014, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; (b) received stetraging materials equivalent to KRW 32,912,00 from the office of the Defendant’s operation; and (c) from August 13, 2014, the Defendant received stegrative lease materials in total of KRW 106,15,500, five times from that time until August 13, 2014, as indicated in attached Table 1.

2. “2016 Highest 2979” - Defendant A Company G was established on August 1, 2008, and entered into a check contract with the name of the Industrial Bank of Korea on November 17, 2009 and entered into a check contract with the name of the said Corporation and entered into a transaction of the check. The Defendant had the said corporation take over on January 20, 2010.

On January 23, 2010, the Defendant issued a copy of the check number “J”, “10,000,000 won at face value”, “10,000,000” in the above corporate office located in the above corporate office in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Seoul, and the date of issuance “2, 9 February 9, 2010,” and presented a payment on February 9, 2010 during the period for presentation by the holders, but failed to pay for the shortage of deposits.

In addition to this, the Defendant recovered the check Nos. 1, 2, 4 through 7, and 9, Nos. 2, 3 and 8, 2, 2, 3, and 9, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, and 9.