logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2016.04.15 2015고단1305 (1)
부정수표단속법위반
Text

All of the public prosecutions against the Defendants are dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the factory laboratory "2015 Highest 1305" defendant A is the representative of Dong-gu E Co., Ltd. located in Seoan-gu, Seoan City, and the corporation B is a corporation established for the purpose of manufacturing, such as building materials.

Defendant

A on September 19, 2014, at the location of the Industrial Bank of Korea located in the Bcheon-dong 718, the Bank of Korea established an amendment of current account transactions in the name of the Defendant at the location of the branch office of the Bcheon-gu, 718, Seocheon-gu.

Defendant

On January 28, 2015, A issued one copy of check number F, issuer A, face value of KRW 50,000,000, and date of payment on March 6, 2015.

However, on March 16, 2015, the holder of the check at issue issued KRW 192,60,000 on five occasions, including the fact that he/she did not pay to the bank on account of the shortage of deposit, etc. even though he/she presented a payment to the bank on March 16, 2015 within the time limit for presentation, but did not pay each for reasons of shortage of deposit, etc.

"2015 Highest 1388"

1. Defendant A is the representative director of Defendant B.

From September 19, 2014, the Defendant entered into a check contract with the branch office of the Bank in the name of the Bank of Korea and B, and traded over the check.

On January 3, 2015, the Defendant issued one copy of the check per bank in the name of “G”, “G”, “25,000,000,000, and date of issuance” in the name of “B” in the B office of the Defendant’s management of the Defendant located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, North Korea.

Around April 22, 2015, the holder of the check presented the check at the Industrial Bank of Korea Branch of the Bank of Korea on April 22, 2015, which was within the period for presentation, but did not receive the deposit shortage. Moreover, the check was not paid as deposit shortage in total amounting to KRW 347,00,000 through nine times from around that time until February 27, 2015.

2. The defendant B, a representative of the defendant, is about the defendant's business.

arrow