The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable for the lower court’s punishment (ten months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, two years of probation, one hundred and twenty hours of social service, an order to attend a lecture for alcohol addiction treatment and therapy, and confiscation).

2. The judgment of the defendant is based on the following facts: (a) the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case in this case on the ground that the wife E was not an emergency rescue worker for the treatment of the defendant's alcohol addiction; (b) committed an first-aid vehicle with a moniter, which is a dangerous object, and then used the first-aid vehicle to an emergency rescue worker, and (c) operated the first-aid vehicle in drinking condition, and requires strict punishment due to the poor and dangerous nature of the crime; (d) the defendant was sentenced twice a fine due to drunk driving, one suspended sentence, and two times a fine due to an act of violence, as well as two times a fine due to a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes; (b) the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 2 years, community service order, education order, and probation after the instant hospital; (c) the defendant argued that there is no need to additionally attend the alcohol addiction treatment lecture upon receiving hospital treatment after being hospitalized by the hospital after the instant case, and there seems to be no special circumstances to consider the defendant's age and injury to the defendant's punishment of this case.