A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and the victim B (the 37 years of age) are married couple.

At around 21:40 on January 28, 2019, the Defendant, within Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, and Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si,

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted an injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. A report on internal investigation (Attachment to tools and photographs used at the time of violence);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of a photographs of damaged parts;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation and medical treatment order, Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 44-2 of the Medical Treatment and Custody Act, and Article 2-3 subparag. 2 of the Act on the Medical Treatment and Custody, etc. - Defendant's mistake is recognized and contradictory

- The Defendant assaulted her spouse on the ground that she became a shot, and her head was found to be a monarcher, and the victim has suffered a considerable loss in her head.

In light of the degree and method of injury, the crime is extremely poor.

-There are many criminal records of violence, which have been punished by two times of suspended sentence of imprisonment (However, when sentenced to suspended sentence, it has long been sentenced to 202) and has been sentenced to 16 times of fine.

There is also a record of being sent as a child protection case due to child abuse.

It seems that there is a possibility of recidivism.

According to the previous investigation of the probation office, according to the prior examination of alcohol use disorder, the defendant and the defendant are stated as the problem drinking person.