The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty in the absence of the fact that the victim’s face was destroyed and damaged at the time of using the victim’s face, is erroneous in misconception of facts.

2. The following facts acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the court below, namely, the defendant, who was investigated by the prosecutor's office as the victim of the victim who was injured by C, stated that he was investigated by the prosecutor's office as the victim of the victim who was injured by C, and that he was making 2 to 3 times of drinking the victim's face, the victim was using his awareness at that time, and the victim consistently stated from the police to the court below that he was damaged by the Defendant's assault, and the victim argued that 10,000 won was disbursed from the police to the court below. According to the letter of statement of use (U. 21 of the Investigation Records), the father of the victim's father was confirmed to have paid KRW 15,00 on May 15, 2010, which is the day of the case, by taking full account of the fact that the defendant's face was damaged by

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit.