logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2013.12.12 2013고단2502
위조유가증권행사등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for a year and two months, respectively.

No. 1, 3, and 4 of seized evidence.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A around December 2, 2012, while residing in the east of Japan, entered the Republic of Korea through the Kimpo Airport on the fourth day of the same month after obtaining 400 copies of a claim amounting to KRW 500 billion per 5,000 (hereinafter referred to as “daily claim”) in the name of Japan (hereinafter referred to as “daily claim”) which was forged from F (the male residing in the 50th after the second half of the same month) and entered the Republic of Korea through the Kimpo Airport on the fourth day of the same month. On August 15, 2013, at the request of the Defendant B, he issued 15 copies of the forged claim while requesting the money exchange from the teahouse located in the Dongdaemun-dong tea located in Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, and delivered 285 additional copies of the above forged claim amount to Defendant A residing in the 23rd of the same month, and Defendant B acquired the above forged claim through the money exchange of the above Defendant B through the Defendant’s money exchange.

1. The Defendants at the above public offering: (a) around 14:00 on September 12, 2013, Defendant B issued three copies of the above Japanese claims issued from Defendant A to H, who knew of the forged facts, at the 7th floor “J” office of the Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul International Building; and (b) stated, “The above Japanese claims are ordinary claims confirmed through B, B, and the Embassy of Japan. It is a normal claim confirmed through B, B, and one billion won paid in advance before tin.”

As a result, the Defendants conspired to exercise three copies of Japanese claims, which are valuable securities.

2. The Defendants attempted to commit fraud according to the above public offering; Defendant B delivered three copies of Japan claims forged as described in paragraph (1) at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) to the victim H for money exchange; and Defendant B intended to receive KRW 1 billion as advance payment from the victim; however, the victim, who became aware of the forgery of Chapter three Japanese claims, did not refuse payment.

arrow