logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2016.06.10 2015구합9162
장애등급결정처분취소
Text

1. On January 22, 2015, the Defendant’s decision on disability ratings rendered to the Plaintiff is revoked.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

On January 3, 2012, the Plaintiff caused the left-hand fluoral rain due to cerebrovascular, and on July 2012, the Plaintiff was registered as a class 2 of cerebral Spacy disorder.

On November 21, 2014, the Plaintiff requested the Defendant to determine the disability grade, and the Defendant determined the Plaintiff’s disability grade 3 on December 9, 2014, based on the results of the National Pension Service’s examination that “The Plaintiff’s disability grade 3 is indicated as walking, personal hygiene, and movementable under the Plaintiff’s aid of an intermediate degree on June 6, 2014, and as the revised detona index 62 points, September 2014.”

On December 24, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an objection against the above decision with the Defendant. However, the Defendant determined the overall function of the Plaintiff on the basis of the brain disease’s brain injury, brain injury, brain stroke, and other brain’s qualitative change, and the degree of mathy of a bridge and the ability to perform daily activities on the basis of walking and daily life movement depending on the degree of cerebriform encephalopathy and the existence of a mathy movement. According to the submitted data, the Plaintiff was assessed on March 24, 2014 on the basis of the revised deel index 58 points on June 62, 2014, and the revised 200 points on June 24, 2014 as follows: “The determination of the mathy disability on the basis of the disability grade criteria constitutes an independent disability index of the Plaintiff’s 20th degree of movement, personal hygiene management, and accompanied by the guardian’s 15th degree of her daily life and 3th degree of movement.”

(hereinafter “instant disposition”). The Plaintiff is the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Administrative Appeals Commission on March 18, 2015.

arrow