A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. No person who violates the Resident Registration Act shall unlawfully use another person's resident registration certificate;

Nevertheless, on November 7, 2018, the Defendant spent the victim C’s mobile phone sales store in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, with the right to properly open a backend mobile phone in the name of “E”, as if he was duly delegated the right to properly open a backend mobile phone in the name of “E”, and unlawfully used the resident registration certificate of “E” for three times in total from that time to December of the same month, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table.

Accordingly, the defendant used another person's resident registration certificate unlawfully.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in the foregoing paragraph (1) of this Article, had an employee, who is unable to know the name of the store operated by E without knowing the fact that he/she was not authorized by E as above, enter “E”, “G” on the statutory date of birth, “E”, and “H” in the application number column, signed in the name of “E”, “E”, and received for opening of a mobile phone from the time to the 12th day of the same month, as shown in the list of crimes committed in the attached Table, and had the employee receive the mobile phone opening for a total of three times from the time to the same month.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the defendant forged the application for joining the mobile phone in the name of E, which is a private document related to rights and duties, and used the forged private document.

3. At the time and place set forth in the above paragraph (1), the Defendant: (a) was authorized to open the instant victim C’s mobile phone in the name of E; and (b) requested the opening of the E mobile phone under the name of E, while committing the same act as paying the said fee for the opened mobile phone.

However, the defendant is true from E.