All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. A list of crimes in the attached Form No. 2 of the judgment of the court below sentenced by Defendant

2. Crimes Nos. 1 and 2: Imprisonment with prison labor for 6 months and 2 years of suspension of execution, crimes No. 1 in the holding of the court below, and crimes No. 2 in the holding of the court below: Imprisonment for 2 years, and confiscation is too unreasonable.

B. The above sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible and unfair.

2. As to the assertion of unfair sentencing by the Defendant and the prosecutor, we examine together the argument of unfair sentencing by both the Defendant and the prosecutor. The Defendant recognized all the facts charged in the instant case as well as reflects his mistake in depth, and the total sum of the damages incurred by the Defendant agreed in the lower court’s agreement with a considerable number of victims is worth KRW 95 million.

List of Attached Crimes among crimes No. 2 in the holding of the court below

2. In the case of crimes Nos. 1 and 2 as indicated in the judgment below, the punishment should be determined in consideration of equity with the case where the crime of violation of the Military Service Act was committed at the same time as stated in the first head of the crime of violation of the judgment below which became final and conclusive, the defendant has no other criminal record other than once before and after having committed the crime of violation of the Military Service Act due to religious reasons, and the crime of this case has been committed more than 100 times by taking advantage of the defendant's thief at night against many unspecified victims over a long period of time, and it has committed a larceny of more than 130 million won in total, and it has been operated by cutting off a vehicle for the purpose of using it for a larceny and getting on and off a vehicle for the purpose of using it, and it has been operated by an investigative agency. In light of the frequency and method of the crime, etc., it is very poor that the defendant committed a part of the crime of this case without care due to a repeated crime due to a violation of the Military Service Act, and there is no special change in circumstances of circumstances.