logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.04.03 2015노66
사기등
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (in the case of crimes No. 1 in the original judgment, the punishment [Attachment 2 No. 1 and No. 2 in the annexed Table No. 1 and No. 2 in the annexed Table No. 2 in the judgment of the court below) and imprisonment of one year and six months (the remaining crimes in the original judgment] of the court below is too unreasonable.

2. Although there is no reason to consider the circumstances such as the confession of the defendant in the judgment of the court below and the agreement with the victim'sO among the crimes No. 1 of the judgment of the court below, the crimes No. 1 and No. 2 of the attached Table No. 2 of the judgment of the court below among the crimes No. 1 of the judgment of the court below and the crimes No. 2 of the attached Table No. 1 through No. 6 of the judgment of the court below should consider the balance of punishment in the case of fraud which became final and conclusive at the same time, the crimes committed by deceiving the victim by forging and using the rental contract in the name of the head of the association, and selling the right to sell money by deceiving the victim, are more serious, the frequency of the crimes is large, the damage amount is large, the damage amount is not recovered from damage of the other victims except the above victim'sO at all. The defendant is again committed during the suspension period of execution due to the same kind of crime, and the crime No. 2 of the attached Table No. 2 of the judgment of the court below's. 1 to the judgment below. 3.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow