1. Defendant A Co., Ltd. shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 35,328,870 as well as its annual interest from January 22, 2014 to November 18, 2016.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On June 4, 2012, Defendant A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant A”) entered into a lease agreement with Defendant B, C, and D (hereinafter “Defendant B, etc.”) on the leased object located near the new site of apartment construction as follows (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”).

(1) The leased object ① Location: Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E, F, G, H, I, and J land (hereinafter “instant land”): 2.4m2: Building area: 456m3m2: On the ground, general steel-frame structure neighborhood living facilities of 506m2 on the second floor (hereinafter “the instant old building”) (2) the lessee destroys the leased object and uses it as the management and operation right holder for three years by re-building out approximately 300 m2 building on the ground under the name of the lessor in place of the lessor, and the lessee’s rights are entirely extinguished. (3) The lessee shall in consultation with the lessor and execute the major structure of the reconstructed object at the responsibilities and costs of the lessee.

A lessee shall assume the responsibilities and expenses of a lessee, such as authorization and permission of re-building, approval for use, acquisition tax, related taxes, and maintenance and management.

(4) It is mutually confirmed that the lease contract may be concluded on the condition that the lessee’s right may be extinguished as an alternative building for the existing leased building upon the expiration of the lease term of three years, deposit money of 30 million won, monthly rent of 18 million won (Annex 5).

B. After that, Defendant A entered into a contract with the Plaintiff for the new construction of the instant building (hereinafter “instant construction”) in order to remove the instant building on the instant land and construct the 4th floor building of the general steel structure (hereinafter “instant building”) in accordance with the instant lease agreement, and the Plaintiff entered into the construction cost of the instant construction.