Defendant

All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal asserts that the court below’s punishment (one year and six months of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable, and the prosecutor asserts that the sentence of the court below is too uneased and unreasonable.

2. The circumstances favorable to the Defendant include the fact that the Defendant recognized the instant crime, the first offender, and the fact that the KRW 4.3 million was seized and temporarily returned to the Z of the victim.

On the other hand, the crime of this case was committed by the defendant by taking part in the crime of Bosing and taking part in the act of collecting cash, and it is not good to the nature of the crime when considering the method of crime and the number of damages, and it is not agreed with the victims, etc. are disadvantageous to the defendant.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the grounds for sentencing indicated in the arguments and records of the instant case, the lower court appears to have been reasonably determined by fully considering all the circumstances, including the various grounds for sentencing asserted by the Defendant and the Prosecutor, and there is no special circumstance to ex post facto change the sentencing.

3. As such, the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.