The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the reasons for appeal (six months of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment has a record of being punished for the same kind of crime several times, and even after being sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment, the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of the suspended sentence. On June 22, 2020, the Defendant again committed the instant crime immediately after receiving a request for a summary order on the same kind of crime, and the victims’ failure to receive a letter from some of the victims, etc. are disadvantageous to the Defendant.

On the other hand, the fact that part of the victims do not want the punishment of the defendant, and that the money that the defendant stolen was seized during the investigation process and was temporarily returned to the victim of the larceny crime is favorable to the defendant.

In addition, the Defendant’s assertion is not acceptable on the grounds that the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable, comprehensively taking account of the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, family environment, motive and background of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the conclusion is groundless.