The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s punishment (amounting to eight million won) is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The Defendant recognized all of the instant crimes and divided his mistake.

The alcohol concentration in blood is not high.

However, even though the defendant was punished twice due to drinking driving, he or she not only drives a drinking again, but also caused a traffic accident in violation of the signal while driving a drinking.

In full view of the above circumstances, Defendant’s character and conduct and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime was committed, and previous convictions, etc., the lower court’s sentence is unreasonable as it is unreasonable.

3. Since the appeal by the prosecutor of the conclusion is well-grounded, the judgment of the court below is reversed pursuant to Article 364(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the following is ruled again after pleading.

[Re-written judgment] The summary of facts constituting an offense and evidence recognized by the court and the summary of the evidence are the same as the stated in each corresponding column of the judgment below, and thus, they are cited in accordance with Article 369 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant provisions of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the selection of imprisonment for a crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (i.e., circumstances favorable to the judgment of reversal as seen earlier);

1. Article 62-2(1) of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on the Observation, etc. of Protection and Observation, Etc., provides for the punishment as set forth in the Disposition, taking into account the following factors: (a) the judgment on the grounds of the above appeal; and (b)