logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2021.01.08 2020노2686
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s punishment (amounting to KRW 10 million) is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The Defendant recognized all of the instant crimes and divided his mistake.

The distance of drinking driving is not along.

However, the defendant was sentenced to a fine in 2014 and 2016 due to drinking driving, but he was also sentenced to drinking.

The alcohol concentration level in blood is not low.

In full view of the above circumstances, Defendant’s character and conduct and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime was committed, and previous convictions, etc., the lower court’s sentence is unreasonable as it is unreasonable.

3. Since the appeal by the prosecutor of the conclusion is well-grounded, the judgment of the court below is reversed pursuant to Article 364(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the following is ruled again after pleading.

[Re-written judgment] The summary of facts constituting an offense and evidence recognized by the court and the summary of the evidence are the same as the stated in each corresponding column of the judgment below, and thus, they are cited in accordance with Article 369 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant provisions of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the selection of imprisonment for a crime;

1. Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of a small amount (the consideration of favorable circumstances among the loss of destruction as seen earlier);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (i.e., circumstances favorable to the judgment of reversal as seen earlier);

1. Article 62-2(1) of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on the Observation, etc. of Protection and Observation, Etc., provides for the punishment as set forth in the Disposition, taking into account the following factors: (a) the judgment on the grounds of the above appeal; and (b)

arrow